balancing traditional and contemporary norms
The region has become the subject of a heated debate over” Asian values” as a result of Asian countries ‘ economic successes, which are frequently achieved using quite different methods https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20221129-the-trust-crisis-facing-women-leaders than those of the West. The alleged uniformity of Eastern economic models, political ideals, and social practices, as well as the responsibility of ethnic factors in East Asia’s emergence as an international power, have been the main topics of discussion in this debate.
One immutable response to these critiques has been East Asians ‘ angry defensiveness. The characterizations of their societies that have emerged in the process are certainly flattering: they are said to be self- reliant, yet miraculously communitarian, centered on personal relationships and mutual obligation more than cold letter of the law – even though the latter is called upon to enforce those values, respectful of hierarchy and authority, and state interventionist, occasionally into the private space of individuals.
This defensiveness is a natural reaction to the fact that the societies involved are experiencing an unprecedented level of change as a result of globalizing forces. The heart of this discussion is, however, the way in which these societies are trying to create norms of governance and social organization that will be viewed as legitimate by their citizens.
This is being done at the local level, in public forums, in local government, and in their respective social and religious institutions. In my informal poll of respondents in 1994 and 1996, I think it’s because the majority of Asians place an emphasis on maintaining https://asianbrides.org/nepal-women/ an organized society even at the expense of some individual freedoms.